May 6, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OIL PAINTING: THE SUPREME DISCIPLINE OF ART. THE OIL SLICK, THE SIZE OF PUERTO RICO, IS BEGINNING TO PAINT COASTLINES
Digital Oil Paintings: http://UBERMORGEN.COM/DEEPHORIZON
The supreme discipline of art - oil painting - is back. It has been 13 days since a BP oil and gas exploration well blew out, setting fire to the drilling rig, which sank, killing 11 people. Ever since, crude oil has been leaking into the Gulf of Mexico, raising the prospects of a historic environmental disaster. Winds from the southeast have nudged the slick northward, where it floated Saturday near the coasts of Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi and has begun to paint the coastlines.
Finally oil painting has evolved into generative bio-art, a dynamic process the world audience can watch live via mass media. Never before has this art form been as revelant and visible as today - only 9-11 was nearly as perfect, but in the genre of performance art. An oil painting on a 80.000 square miles ocean canvas with 32 million liters of oil - a unique piece of art.
We exclusively use aeriall images from the oil spill. The files are ready-mades but we waived our right to use them "as is" and decided to use a special digital technique to produce a statement about the disconnection of form and color and about contemporary and futuristic imaging procedures. We use a compressor (sorenso codec) and consumer video editing-software and manually loop 2 frames, the image becomes liquid, transforms and deformes. These visualisations represent the "Verkuenstlichung" of nature and the "Vernatuerlichung" of art. Unedited oil-paintings of the event can be found via search-engines, on boston.com or on the NASA Earth Observatory website.
UBERMORGEN.COM are well known for similar projects. What they wanted to achieve with these alienating and retro-visual "web-paintings", as they call it, is not clear. "Since we work for digital penetration of the art market " declared Hans Bernhard "we should get used to radical changes of our networked point of view and in particular about new forms of digital painting".
"I saw the NASA earth observatory images and I was blown away", lizvlx stated "Finally traditional painting made its comeback as a high-tech innvovative art form and not as the starving grandparent of photography, video, digital art and performance. As a former painter I am thrilled and as a digital artist I want to work this material until it bleeds".
"We're breaking new ground here. It's hard to formulate a defense for an artwork exploiting a human caused desaster that has no precedent, which is what this is," Curator Felix Vogel said, defending the artist duo UBERMORGEN.COM against not writing a response for "what is just a shift of perspective what you couldn't anticipate, but possibly with big impact on the art business."
After the images and the video circulated online the feedback hit hard on UBERMORGEN.COM: "It is perverted and sick to compare a mass media spectacle and natural desaster with the century old tradition of fine art painting" comments a curator who chose to remain anonymous "it is obvious that this comes from the ice-breaking european techno-art avant-garde. They step onto our fine tradition without the slightest idea of the consequences - and i am not talking about the butterfly effect"!
UBERMORGEN.COM have a record of experimental projects and radical positions. In 2001 they broadcast a live-webpainting "Attack on Democrazy" during the first 8 hours of the 9-11 attacks. They intuitively understood that the attack was a mass media intrusion, a "Media Hack". They are infamous for their Vote-Auction Media Hack, featuring the buying and selling of individual votes during the presidential election Al Gore vs. G.W. Bush in the year 2000. Since 2001 they work on different series of web-paintings, by definition non-functional websites serving as images rather than interactive document-structures.
Getver. gets me thinking about the freedom of speech discussion, yes you are allowed to say anything, but do you really have too?
BeantwoordenVerwijderenMoreover i think this radicalism (rationalism) does not produce good images (and isnt realy radical). It is only cowards that try to abstract away reality because its a bit too much to handle. And make it into a cynical joke. You dont have to tell/show us its bad! We know, right? Show us something we dont know, thank you (not you, them).
it is cynical.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenbut the jury in my head is still out consulting... the enormity of the problem and not the aesthetics demand the lengthy consultation. [lack of redundancy in safety, obama's recent decision to allow offshore drilling, schwarzenegger's decision not to allow offshore drilling right after the beginning of this event, etc.]
radical is not even an aesthetic category...
have to think more...
true true
BeantwoordenVerwijdereni am very allergic for cynicism, so react to that.
still. something is wrong with the images..
Very intrigued here. I try to make it simple, to step in there (ubermorgen) point of view. So there is huge problem.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenAnd we are numb, we don't see it. We don't feel it. It is not us. The sea is not us. Photo's (wonder what world press photo winner up will come out of this) and video do not enter, us. We have an opinion, maybe. Over coffee.
I think this is not about the image, not about the estheatics.
Art (and image and esthaetics) are means to at least, come across. A very difficult goal.Or is this too simple.
I belief in the newness of the concept. For me this newness and this provocative cynisism, works. This mix of worlds, of language. It makes me question me. It questions art.
Here we are, making a painting, while BP and Obama fuss over something that cannot be solved.
A great painting get's a whole different meaning.
To see pretty in ugly is a way of survival.
i go with judy. the cynical point lies somewhere else since these guys (BP) don't really know what they are doing. man does not run nature...old wisdom, maybe forgoten.
BeantwoordenVerwijderento say it with deleuze "the world (or nature) doesnt dissapear it just becomes more artificial" (?) are you optimisic enough for the 21st century boy/girl?
oh btw., i talked last week to an old friend of mine, she is an artiste in germany and she told me, fitting here, about a colleague of hers,a painter who works only with found oil,escaped from ships,on beaches,on his paintings. true oil paint, so to say!! his idea is to take over the whole company of BP, by buying their stocks. he uses his painting- sales for that. people do buy the paintings, by the value of BP stocks, given that day by the official stockmarket!cynical? high/low, let's go!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenyeah!
BeantwoordenVerwijderena bit different but from ubermorgen.com as well!
who said again the fall of the twin tower is the best work of art?
BeantwoordenVerwijderenStockhausen
BeantwoordenVerwijderenThe spill covers at least 2500 square miles of ocean surface. You can see the extent of the damage here as of May 6th, just southeast of New Orleans.
about this twin tower art, it comes down to a moral stand. Taking a responsibility in this not avoiding morals as cliche. I go with Asia's explanation of the performance, the cleaning role of art. In the end, awareness, forgiveness, making room. I think art in essence is good.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenThat's why this is an immoral statement (twin towers is art) That's why it is not art also. It is an interesting statement, because it makes you think. Never before has the world been divided, have been manipulated in a good-evil black and white way as after this attack.
Since the Twin tower, good and bad are shaken, reversed and all together have a whole new meaning.
An addition: 1964 Documenta III sculpture, drawings. Joseph Beuys recommends that the Berlin Wall be elevated by 5 cm (better proportions!)
BeantwoordenVerwijderen