Hi
I am not a feminist. I dont like feminist. I like women. Feminists dont enjoy the beauty that women can offer. Its OKE to be decorative! Moreover, you dont need to show bushy bush to be a tough woman. Moreover even more just holding a machine gun in a gallery or museum is REALLY STUPID. GUNS ARE FOR SHOOTING. These girls below know how to shoot a gun, they JUST LOVE IT. And make a very positive contribution by showing us how much they do.
ps i fixed the width of this movie too but you might want to watch this full screen, ciao
ps ps i LOVE AMERICA how great s a country where IT IS OKE to shoot your machine gun in your backyard! Wearing your bikini!
ps ps ps whats even BETTER is that in your bikini it dont matter if you hit target, just look good shooting woehaw!
oh wow, and what about the child-soldiers? shouldn't they stay home and been taken care of their gun shooting mothers?
BeantwoordenVerwijderensure! they can help mummy load the guns
BeantwoordenVerwijderenthank you for adjusting size! (now much easier to hit full screen button.) as to chicks with guns - lovely! as to what you reacted 2 well, did i ever say u were a feminist? i will come back to links since you only reacted 2 images but not the links... nevertheless happy you did! choose your targets, (hahaha) &lgt;a href""&rgt; with gusto! while saving the whales in world peace!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenreally babsi, i don't know, are you serious about this? can you explain more whats your problem with feminists? i can feel you're hurt, what did the feminists take away from you?
BeantwoordenVerwijdereni even have cigarette boxes with chicks with guns under the brand name "smoke" on them... i am not about beliefs (as much as i can help) but about what is "out" there (if you please targets)... applying what used to be called "brute force" will not get you denial of service results... so welcome to soldier on!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenprivate message: - targets got you going? bullseye!
hurt? i am just against any form of discrimination. i am humanimalist.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenfeminists always talk about what they cant do or dont have.
i say yes we can but do we want to?
kewl
BeantwoordenVerwijderenwelcome! kinda missed your voice... thanks! will be off after watching movies...
BeantwoordenVerwijderenjust a farewell: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A61i0Xscj-k
you mean animalsim is a part of the human condition as we can see serial killers are a then just the bitter end of this logical follow up of what you say. and in culture we have a huge system that keeps the lion in us calm. a cooler way so to say. but civilization has a huge brutal potentcity when it comes to create violence,its in itself.i doubt social darwinism and i doubt guns and money are a logical extension of human evolution on this planet. the invention of tools is more important for us. fuck guns! why do i need a video of a gun carrying woman to precondition myself into what? the woman carrying a gun - as the ultimate sexual fantasy of obtaining power over man and woman! of course i like to see trash like this since there is no god, jus be carefull of not creating a new dumber one, i think!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia
and especially her fantastic book
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Personae
ok.
BeantwoordenVerwijderena blog is a blog and all kinds of things silly, serious and serials (tav and killers) can be and thankfully now do get published.
nevertheless a voice is echoing in the chambers about "but oh ya that was a nice link"... these 2 (action pants) posts have links not just images - i remember since i put them there! they bring insights far beyond what these images can on themselves. say for example tell the story of constructing them... or like only the 2nd image was taken in a gallery or museum…
i think what is linked there ought to be brought into the discussion. of course it can be confusing that some posts have texts right there and some only behind the jump.
so brbr, please look at links in the 2 posts and afterward let's continue!
"i doubt social darwinism and i doubt guns and money are a logical extension of human evolution on this planet. the invention of tools is more important for us"
BeantwoordenVerwijderenI don't think that guns are a product of social darwinism, i have a bit of trouble with this term, in this sense.
I think that guns are not a logical extension of human evolution, like you sad, but an extension of men itself. It's definitely a tool, a tool that you need in war. Like you need other tools in aother "wars". Like Sheakspare already told 'The pen is mightier than the sword', a logical development is that you say 'the picture is mightier than the pen'. I think the act of war has to do with getting towards a new balance, can be technological, social, political. For instance the coldwar, was mainly a war fought by informationtechnology. But let's not go into that beacuse that's not the discussion here.
On the other hand if you say "Fuck guns" you have to say a hell of a lot more "Fucks" before you erase the effect of the gun. Because guns have a big share in technology, even today in this electrical era (i'm not sure if we are still in that anymore). It's proven that after or during a war, technology get's a boost. For example in the beginning of the 18th century, with the origin of the gun, the idea existed to shoot something threw a barrel. The only problem was that they couldn't create a whole in a barrel that time. Because of the gun they started to develop what we even use know the mechanical steel drill. And even during the iraqi war with the robot-technology.
I'm not defending any wars here but i try to understand what consequences war has, positive or negative. And there's off course an exaggeration in it, for example the atom bomb, that's a thing that in my opinion has nothing to do with balance, but is more of a powersymbol. But this thing was invented after the mechanical era, sort of say more in the electrical. I'm curious what the quantum physics are gonna bring us.
well yes, you do defend war here because you scale down a very big problem we have nowadays. they call it the military-industrial complex. as you might know, they (pentagon & the bullshit warindustry) run american wars now since the 2nd world war. as a way to get to big money!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenthis politix are very far away from any tool invention that might help us in our daily lives.or are we talking about gps and microwaves? war has always NEGATIVE consequences. what is there to be understood? PEOPLE GET KILLED finished, done!!! bang, bang i shot your mom, your brother yourself and thats it. you are history! the war of words a la shakespare i dont care about. but there is a missunderstanding going on since the time of the ol greece. when heraclitus said: "war is the father of everything."
but what he really ment was the unity of oppositions. warm and cold, dark and light. you cannot have the one without the other. since these words appeared there is the tendency to aply them for any kind of bullshit propaganda, as if we couldnt live without wars. we can be lucky in europe not to have these problems anymore. and of course fuck guns (!!) because looking at the us we can see where all the guns lead us to! check only michael moore bowling for columbine film.
the atom bomb as "exaggeration" sorry but are you kidding ...? a "powersymbol", and what about hiroshima ? that wasn't only a "symbolical" act, right? the atom bomb came up to establish a world in fear of a new war. a status quo where the legitimation of world dominance shouldnt be put in question anymore.
not a symbolical order- but a power act! there is no symbolism involved, this is serious politixx goin on :first we establish our own political system all over the world, like the US. to gain access to oil for a country that is depending so much on it...then we call it democracy. human rights and so on.
there is a contradiction in these things.
and any titty-shakin-gun-holding girlies won't solve any of these probelms. also in my eyes, its a big mistake to use a bottom line redskin - couldnt even call it "culture" but what else - to go against an intellectual idea which has at least in big parts done something for women...but no problem let's get back to the middle ages friends ! i am a man i don't care...
Like i said before i'm not defending war and i'm not going into the subjects of war, beacause that's not what this discussion is about. "The medium is the message" here. War always has negative consequences, i totally agree with this, but not only, maybe for one party. I'm not taliking about microwaves and GPS here, not only material forms also research that can be used for environmental causes. I still think the atom bomb is a powersymbol and it is because of Hiroshima. What a lot of people don't know that the Japanese unofficially surrended and still the bomb was thrown to show the whole world the power of the atombomb and the US, so for me this is a powersymbol and i don't mean it like what the Kalachnikov is for the revolutionaries, its on the other end. And the power expressed, with throwing the bomb, is because the japanese civilazation was turned inside-out and stirred with a stick. But to cut it short and to get to my reaction, the possibility to get to guns, leads too more death, i don't know, i think this is such a difficult subject and i don't think you can say it's because of guns there's a lot more things involved in this story. If you would get rid of all the guns in the world, we would be thrown back to the middle ages or maybe even further, but would this stop us from killing each other, a big NO!! This is a really really difficult story. I think the effect of Michael Moore is great, altough i ask myself how it is in the US itself. But he's also a bit of a naive presenter of facts. He had this example in his movie about the gunpolicy in Canada that's not much different than of the US. But the murder rate there's much lower than in the US. If you would kill yourself and you had all the possibilities in the world, what would you use?
BeantwoordenVerwijderenmy message is a message and not only a cold medium here. here is a real man who tries to express opinions and feelings. even mcluhan should know that. maybe the law definition can help. anything can be used as a weapon. a walking stick can turn into a deadly weapon only by using it the "right" way....and i really don't want to kill myself!?
BeantwoordenVerwijderenwow what a stupid movie + some cynisism can unleash!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenSorry if I offended anyone with the video, shall I remove it?
I didnt mean (you really thought so? online text is harsh) this video to go against feminism.
I dont want to be able to have all the same as men in a mens world. But women are so used to seeing themselves trhough the eyes of men, we wouldnt know what a mens-womans world would look like!
Thats bloody sad isnt it. And has been for more then thousands of years. For me feminism is an opposition. The oposite of ? I am against this opposition.
Lets all live together whoever whatever you are. And if you want to be a playmate and are happy that way, who the hell am I to judge that! Being a playmate may be less harmfull then a nina brink.
Of course the video or what it represents is dum. but be carefull these dum people are with many and have very, very big guns and are not afraid of using them.
Its not just trash, its real, its out there. It can get elected.
Lets not be dum.
and sure zsolt, i went to the links, looked at the text (read only parts) but the image was so strong (and wants to be strong) that I was not eager to find out what was behind it. It is a strong image going the oposite of something i feel strongly about. And yes always put your own concepts to the test, especially the ones that are dear, and i mostly try to do so. But this one didnt do that for me... sorry!
ps i changed email with the blog. Forgot about online identity and privacy.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenI forgot one thing! The original performance was from the sixties! thats a totally different era of course.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenbla bla time for some beers, whos going to anitas tonight?
i only have 2 thumbs, sh*te, but both are up for this post, pure dirt!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenand both down for myself! for i shoudda invited you 2 watch city of women by fellini with us, freedom and martien yesterday. i apologize! will you forgive me?
"what a mens-womans world" - here we go. i mean i dunno what it looks like but here in this post it does feel like it. scream if you want to, sing if you want to, think if you want to or just hide if you want to...
BeantwoordenVerwijderenso maybe now that's what i want to and quoting classics will do fine: "with a withering fear to stop us to become something that we always were, ..., namely poor or slow but not helpless..."
please don't remove anything ! good work !
BeantwoordenVerwijderenalas I would have loved to watch that one..
BeantwoordenVerwijderenHope it was good? Cheers